1 Strategic Vision
 
The research proposes a paradigm shift in public-health management: from disease control to the intentional design of health, adopting a systemic and salutogenic approach.
Inspired by Total Quality Management (TQM) principles, ISO 9001:2015-compliant Quality Management Systems, and W. Edwards Deming’s vision, the project embraces continuous improvement and shared values. It is aligned with the “Quality Built-in” principle, ensuring that results conform to requirements from the very design stage, thereby reducing downstream errors and costs.
 
2 Objectives
 
The primary objective of the research is to focus attention and raise awareness of the need for correct lifestyles—especially a healthy diet—to reduce the risk of chronic diseases:
  • By creating and regularly updating an archive that gathers the current state of chronic-disease-prevention management methods used by international and national institutions.
  • By analysing the collected documentation through a correlation document that maps each practice against ISO 9001 clauses.
 
3 Target Audience & Openness
 
The project is open internationally to public and private bodies, non-profit organisations, academic institutions, quality professionals, healthcare practitioners, and communities committed to the systemic promotion of health.
 
4 Current Promoters & Collaborators
 
Quality experts, healthcare professionals, and university lecturers:
  • Enrolled in the dedicated international LinkedIn group for open discussion and dissemination.
Non-profit organisations active in spreading Quality methodologies:
  • Italy – AICQ through the AICQ-CI Healthcare Working Group.
 
5 Tools & Outputs
 
With the support of the collaborative website www.historyofquality.com, the following archives are being published and continuously updated:
  • Output 1 – Archive of Links to Public Administrations & Civil-Society Organisations Using Systemic Methods for Chronic-Disease Prevention
  • Purpose: A systematic map of global public-health actors, useful for certification bodies and for benchmarking similar realities.
  • Access: Go to page
  • Output 2 – Archive of Chronic-Disease Management Methods by Country & Organisation
  • Purpose: Transparent, replicable sharing of evidence-based practices classified with a salutogenic lens and linked to ISO 9001 clauses.
  • Access: Go to page – Additional documents are available in the LinkedIn group comments.
  • Output 3 – Simulated ISO 9001 Audit Reports
  • Purpose: Practical examples of how to apply ISO 9001 in a salutogenic way; useful for QMS design.
  • Access: Go to page (under construction) – Currently available in the LinkedIn group, section 9.2.
  • Output 4 – QMS Model for Health Promotion
  • Purpose: A certifiable, adaptable, and scalable quality-system model for health-promoting organisations.
  • Access: Go to page – Contents are also posted in the LinkedIn group comments.
  • Output 5 – Certification Checklist Based on IDEF0
  • Purpose: A systematic, verifiable, and modular checklist referencing both IDEF0 and ISO 9001 to facilitate real-world adoption.
  • Access: Go to page
  • The full page is accessible only to active study-group members.
  • Output 6 – Systemic Gap-Analysis Model
  • Purpose: A self-assessment tool to map current processes against ISO 9001 and salutogenic principles.
  • Access: Published in the LinkedIn group, comment under clause 9.2. Currently under evaluation for possible relocation to another clause.
 
6  Outlook
 
Develop a certifiable and verifiable “Disciplinary Framework” that Conformity-Assessment Bodies (CABs) can use to guide organisations in building effective, measurable, and sustainable health-generating systems.
 
7 ISO 9001, Design and Salutogenesis - Methodological clarification and the role of third-party audits
 
In ours research work, the reference to salutogenesis does not carry an ideological or broadly theoretical meaning, but is deliberately limited and grounded in a precise methodological rationale.
Ours interest in salutogenesis arises exclusively from its conceptual connection with Clause 8.3 – Design and development of the ISO 9001:2015 standard.
After many years of working with the APQP methodology within the IATF 16949 framework, a conviction typical of quality culture has become firmly established in ours professional thinking:
quality – and therefore the final outcome – is created during the design phase, not during downstream inspection or control. In the industrial domain, this principle is well established: if a product is poorly designed, no final inspection can make it compliant.
When this logic is transferred to the field of health, the parallel becomes clear: chronic diseases are not sudden events, but the coherent outcome of life, environmental, dietary and organizational processes that have not been designed, or have been poorly designed.
In this sense, the term salutogenesis is instrumental and functional, not identitarian: it refers to the concept of genesis, origin and upstream design of health, fully consistent with the logic of ISO 9001 Clause 8.3.
However, even before the role of nutrition—which nevertheless remains a fundamental determinant of chronic diseases—what emerges most clearly from ours professional experience is the extraordinary value of third-party audits, carried out by highly qualified assessors in organizations certified to ISO 9001 or IATF 16949, and in particular the regular and ongoing support (often on a bi-monthly basis) that such audits make possible.
These audits do not merely represent conformity assessments; rather, they constitute a powerful mechanism for organizational learning.
Systematic interaction with experienced auditors promotes:
a deeper and more mature understanding of the standards;
the internalization of the process approach;
the concrete application of true continuous improvement, understood not as a formal requirement but as a daily management practice.
Continuous improvement, as embedded in ISO standards, is not a recent invention, but is rooted in the thinking of quality pioneers such as W. Edwards Deming, whose contributions enabled the evolution of product and service quality across many nations.
Based on this experience, I believe that a strong third-party audit culture, when exercised with competence, independence and continuity, represents one of the most effective mechanisms for the design and sustained maintenance of quality.
Applied rigorously and systemically, this same logic can offer a decisive contribution in the field of health promotion and the reduction of chronic diseases, complementing and reinforcing actions on primary determinants, starting with nutrition.
In summary, our approach does not propose an alternative theory of health, but rather a conscious transposition of the principles of quality, design and continuous improvement—as embodied in ISO 9001—into the field of public health, where designing well upstream means structurally reducing the need for downstream intervention.